CVE-2025-32463 Sudo chroot (chwoot)
Introduction
The Stratascale Cyber Research Unit (CRU) recently discovered multiple local privilege escalation vulnerabilities in sudo. This research focuses on CVE-2025-32463, a flaw in the rarely used --chroot (-R) option that allows a local user to escalate privileges to root, even in tightly restricted environments where sudo access appears minimal.
What is sudo
On almost every Unix-like system, sudo is a foundational privilege management tool that allows users to execute commands as another user, typically root. It plays a critical role in enforcing the principle of least privilege, enabling administrators to delegate specific administrative tasks without revealing the root password. Additionally, sudo ensures accountability by logging every privileged action to system logs, creating an audit trail essential for monitoring, auditing, and forensic investigations.
On June 28, 2025, security researcher Rich Mirch of the Stratascale Cyber Research Unit disclosed a critical vulnerability in sudo related to its --chroot option. This vulnerability is tracked as:
This bug was rated critical due to its minimal requirements for exploitation and the complete root compromise it enables.
Summary of the Vulnerability:
CVSS v3.1 Score: 9.3 (Critical)
Impact: Allows local privilege escalation to root, even when a user is confined to a chroot environment
Affected Versions:
sudostable 1.9.14 - 1.9.17Exploitation has been verified on:
Ubuntu 24.04.1; Sudo 1.9.15p5, Sudo 1.9.16p2
Fedora 41 Server; Sudo 1.9.15p5
Legacy versions (
<= 1.8.32) are not affected, as the--chrootfeature did not exist prior tosudo1.9.14.Discovered by: Rich Mirch of the Stratascale Cyber Research Unit
Patched in: sudo 1.9.17p1, released June 30, 2025
Remediation
Install sudo 1.9.17p1 or later.
Visit https://www.sudo.ws/security/advisories/chroot_bug for additional information
Impact
The default sudo configuration is vulnerable in versions where the --chroot option is supported. Although this vulnerability involves the sudo -R (chroot) feature, it does not require any custom sudoers rules to be defined for a specific command. If a user is allowed to invoke sudo -R even with minimal privileges. they may be able to exploit this vulnerability to gain full root access.
This means that any local unprivileged user could potentially escalate privileges to root if a vulnerable version of sudo is installed and the -R option is accessible to them. Importantly, the exploit does not depend on network access, remote code execution, or any kernel-level vulnerability. It abuses how sudo interacts with the Name Service Switch (NSS) mechanism from within a chrooted environment.
Exploitation has been verified on:
Ubuntu 24.04.1; Sudo 1.9.15p5, Sudo 1.9.16p2
Fedora 41 Server; Sudo 1.9.15p5
What is chroot
chroot, short for “change root”, is a Unix/Linux feature that lets you change the apparent root directory (/) for the current process and its children. It’s often used for sandboxing or recovery environments, but it was never designed as a security feature.
Once inside a chroot, the process sees the specified directory as /, and cannot see or access anything “outside” of it.
You might use chroot when:
You want to run a program in isolation, away from the real system files.
You're compiling or testing software in a clean environment.
You're setting up a basic development jail for untrusted code.
Let’s walk through a basic example to simulate what a chroot environment looks like.
Step 1: Create a fake root directory structure
Step 2: Copy a statically linked binary
Step 3: Enter the chroot
Now inside the chroot:
Your root
/is actually~/chroot_env/Commands like
ls,find, and/etc/passwddo not exist unless explicitly copied inYou’re in a sandboxed view of the filesystem
Here’s what the shell looks like:
chroot ≠ Security
Even though chroot limits the visible filesystem, it does not prevent privilege escalation or full system access if:
The process is running as root inside the chroot
The attacker retains open file descriptors to outside paths
The program inside the chroot loads libraries or configuration from outside (e.g., NSS)
In fact, this lack of isolation is exactly what makes CVE-2025-32463 dangerous: sudo -R assumes chroot isolation, but under certain conditions, it loads attacker-controlled code as root from outside the chroot.
To help you understand why this vulnerability works, we need to explain:
What is NSS (Name Service Switch)?
Name Service Switch (NSS) is a component of the GNU C Library (glibc) that defines how a system resolves names for users, groups, hosts, etc. It allows Linux to flexibly query information from various sources like:
/etc/passwdLDAP
NIS
DNS
it's controlled by the file:
This tells the system:
When resolving usernames (passwd), first check
/etc/passwd, then querysystemd.For hostnames, check
/etc/hosts, then DNS.
Behind the scenes, the GNU C Library (glibc) uses shared libraries to implement each NSS module.
files→/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnss_files.so.2dns→/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnss_dns.so.2systemd→/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnss_systemd.so.2
What makes NSS dangerous in this context is how glibc dynamically loads shared libraries (like libnss_files.so.2) at runtime based on configuration.
If sudo calls any name resolution function after it enters a chroot, and that chroot contains attacker-controlled versions of these libraries, it results in arbitrary code execution as root.
So if your process is chrooted, those libraries will be looked for inside the chroot.
How sudo interacts with NSS
When you run a command with sudo, it needs to:
Resolve the target username and group
Log actions by resolving the calling user
Apply the correct
sudoerspolicies based on resolved identities
All of these steps rely on name resolution. which is handled via glibc’s NSS system.
Vulnerable source code analysis
These functions depend on glibc’s Name Service Switch (NSS) mechanism, which:
Reads
/etc/nsswitch.confto determine what backend to use (files,ldap, etc.)Dynamically loads
libnss_*.so.2from/libor/usr/lib
Since the root directory has been changed, these libraries are now attacker-controlled. And since sudo is still running as setuid root, those libraries are executed with elevated privileges.
Exploitation flow
Attacker creates fake root at /tmp/chrooted and includes:
Malicious
libnss_files.so.2Controlled
/etc/nsswitch.conf
Runs:
Inside sudo:
Calls
chroot("/tmp/chrooted")Later calls
getpwuid()or similar (e.g., via PAM or group setup)glibc:
Reads attacker's
/etc/nsswitch.confLoads attacker's
/lib/libnss_files.so.2
Malicious
.soruns with root privileges
POC analysis
Creates a temporary working directory under /tmp for our chrooted exploit environment. mktemp -d ensures a random, safe directory name.
Handles input:
If the user supplies no arguments, default to launching a root shell (/bin/bash).
If arguments are provided, use them as the command to run inside the chroot.
Escapes special characters so that the Bash command can be embedded inside a C string safely.
This is the payload:
__attribute__((constructor))means: run this function automatically when the library loads.setreuid(0, 0)andsetregid(0, 0): become root.chdir("/"): clean up working directory.execl("/bin/sh", ...): spawn a shell as root.
Prepares the chroot environment:
woot/becomes the root.nsswitch.confsays: use a fake NSS backend called/woot1337forpasswdresolution.This forces glibc to look for
libnss_woot1337.so.2in/liborlibnss_*/.
The
groupfile is copied so that basic commands relying on group resolution don’t crash.
Compiles the payload:
-shared -fPIC: produces a shared object suitable for dynamic loading.-Wl,-init,woot: ensures thewoot()constructor runs when loaded.Output file is
libnss_/woot1337.so.2, which glibc will use when resolvingpasswd.
sudo -R woot woot→ invokes sudo in a chroot environment rooted atwoot/, and runs thewootcommand.rm -rf ${STAGE}: cleanup.
Executing the poc
Acknowledgement & Credit
The CVE-2025-32463 Sudo chroot Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability was discovered by Rich Mirch of the Stratascale Cyber Research Unit. The Stratascale CRU team thanks the Sudo maintainer, Todd Miller, for the partnership in resolving these issues.
Last updated
Was this helpful?